All Forums Forum List Register Members List Calendar Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Mountain Biking Forums > Mountain Biking > Disc brakes


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-07-2007, 09:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
CB
 
Posts: n/a
Disc brakes

I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
it just occured to me.....

Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
one is bent?

Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 09:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Phil, Non-Squid
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Disc brakes

CB wrote:
> I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
> it just occured to me.....
>
> Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
> one is bent?
>
> Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......


For MTBs, it's hard to wear down a SS rotor down to the minimum wear limit.
I did a quick search and was unable to find any values for minimum
thickness. There's a chance, however, that it may be printed on the rotor
itself, as they are on motorcycle disc brakes. Examine it closely for such
information.

--
Phil


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 11:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
reco_diver@hotmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Disc brakes

On Feb 7, 10:08 pm, "CB" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
> it just occured to me.....
>
> Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
> one is bent?
>
> Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......


I posted this sometime last summer. ...

One of the former Shimano USA tech reps gave out the the number of .
20
mm from the nominal width I believe.

This is based on the rotor not being out of true or scored, both of
which tend to end the life of a rotor long before a reduction in
thickness.


Also consider that, given the semi-industrial standard (there was
one?)
of 2 mm, various rotors seem to run nominal widths of between 1.80 mm
and 2.2 mm. So knowing what the nomial width that you started with
would be key. Current Shimano rotors seem to be coming in at 2.0 mm,
but the older RT75's that I have listed were coming in at the low end
....1.8 mm.


Just for the fun of it here are a few numbers that we came up with
while doing some brake trials. small n ... 4 rotors measured for each
average.


Avid Stainless 1.9 mm
Aztec Stainless 2.0 mm
Shinamo SM-RT61 1.8 mm
Shimano SM-RT75 1.8 mm
Shimano SM-RT77 1.8 mm
Shimano SM-RT96 1.8 mm
Shakamuri Ti 2.0 mm
Stan's Al 2.1

R
What was once old is new again.

  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21