The election results II - Page 2 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

11-04-2004, 06:32 AM

On 4 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (live-free) wrote:

>The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
>democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused
>the whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!
>Kerry did the smart thing and conceeded the election quickly!
>
>I think that the whole idea of political parties is crazy! Just vote
>for the person that you agree with the most. I personally think some
>of what Kerry had to say made sense, but I also agree with some of
>what Bush says! And Nader is just a nutball!
>
>The President has my support on the war on terrorism and homeland
>security, but his economic policies and energy plans are insane! We
>need an economic plan that encourages companies to keep jobs here in
>our country, and energy policies that will help reduce our relience on
>fossil fuels.
>
>There are so many different sources of energy that can be used now it
>is silly that we still rely on fuels that have been around for
>hundreds of years. How about solar and wind? Or hydrodynamic?
>
>Ken

Biggest stock market winners the day after the election? Drug
companies, military companies, oil companies. Biggest loser?
Alternative energy.

Gee, I wonder why.

11-04-2004, 06:32 AM

On 4 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (live-free) wrote:

>The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
>democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused
>the whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!
>Kerry did the smart thing and conceeded the election quickly!
>
>I think that the whole idea of political parties is crazy! Just vote
>for the person that you agree with the most. I personally think some
>of what Kerry had to say made sense, but I also agree with some of
>what Bush says! And Nader is just a nutball!
>
>The President has my support on the war on terrorism and homeland
>security, but his economic policies and energy plans are insane! We
>need an economic plan that encourages companies to keep jobs here in
>our country, and energy policies that will help reduce our relience on
>fossil fuels.
>
>There are so many different sources of energy that can be used now it
>is silly that we still rely on fuels that have been around for
>hundreds of years. How about solar and wind? Or hydrodynamic?
>
>Ken

Biggest stock market winners the day after the election? Drug
companies, military companies, oil companies. Biggest loser?
Alternative energy.

Gee, I wonder why.

11-04-2004, 06:32 AM

On 4 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (live-free) wrote:

>The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
>democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused
>the whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!
>Kerry did the smart thing and conceeded the election quickly!
>
>I think that the whole idea of political parties is crazy! Just vote
>for the person that you agree with the most. I personally think some
>of what Kerry had to say made sense, but I also agree with some of
>what Bush says! And Nader is just a nutball!
>
>The President has my support on the war on terrorism and homeland
>security, but his economic policies and energy plans are insane! We
>need an economic plan that encourages companies to keep jobs here in
>our country, and energy policies that will help reduce our relience on
>fossil fuels.
>
>There are so many different sources of energy that can be used now it
>is silly that we still rely on fuels that have been around for
>hundreds of years. How about solar and wind? Or hydrodynamic?
>
>Ken

Biggest stock market winners the day after the election? Drug
companies, military companies, oil companies. Biggest loser?
Alternative energy.

Gee, I wonder why.

11-04-2004, 07:39 AM

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:

> The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused the
> whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!

You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?

Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.

Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
Osama recently in the news.

11-04-2004, 07:39 AM

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:

> The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused the
> whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!

You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?

Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.

Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
Osama recently in the news.

11-04-2004, 07:39 AM

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:

> The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused the
> whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!

You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?

Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.

Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
Osama recently in the news.

11-04-2004, 07:39 AM

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:

> The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused the
> whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!

You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?

Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.

Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
Osama recently in the news.

11-04-2004, 08:10 AM

Gore was definately not a good loser, how many weeks of recounts did they do
4 weeks worth!

"maxo" <maxo@NOSPAMhome.se> wrote in message
news

an.2004.11.04.15.39.19.63576@NOSPAMhome.se.. .
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:
>
> > The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> > democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused
the
> > whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!
>
> You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?
>
> Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.
>
> Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
> individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
> a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
> Osama recently in the news.
>

11-04-2004, 08:10 AM

Gore was definately not a good loser, how many weeks of recounts did they do
4 weeks worth!

"maxo" <maxo@NOSPAMhome.se> wrote in message
news

an.2004.11.04.15.39.19.63576@NOSPAMhome.se.. .
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:
>
> > The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> > democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused
the
> > whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!
>
> You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?
>
> Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.
>
> Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
> individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
> a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
> Osama recently in the news.
>

11-04-2004, 08:10 AM

Gore was definately not a good loser, how many weeks of recounts did they do
4 weeks worth!

"maxo" <maxo@NOSPAMhome.se> wrote in message
news

an.2004.11.04.15.39.19.63576@NOSPAMhome.se.. .
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:16 -0800, live-free wrote:
>
> > The results - Kerry loses and does not whine avout it! How unlike a
> > democrat! Not that all the dummycrats are bad, but when Al Gore caused
the
> > whole big stink in 2000 that really turned me off of the party!
>
> You're of the school that rape victims should shut the hell up too, eh?
>
> Gore WAS gracious in 2000, but perhaps your memory's a bit foggy.
>
> Supporting the war on terrorism? Smarter is to support the war on
> individual terrorists, if we'd focused on that and not on waging war with
> a technique, perhaps we wouldn't have to have seen the taunting video of
> Osama recently in the news.
>