Formal Complaint: Roger B - Page 2 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

01-30-2005, 09:16 PM

"maxo" <maxo@NOSPAMhome.se> wrote in message
news

an.2005.01.31.04.40.20.249516@NOSPAMhome.se. ..
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:09:56 +0000, Brian Wax wrote:
>
> > I would encourage others to file a complaint
>
> I sent one to his ISP with the full headers and IP, we'll see...
>
> In the meantime, do try a Usenet client that allows you to have a killfile
> to sort out the idiots.
>
> I like the Pan Newsreader, but there are many others.
>
>

>
i have OE which has "block sender". is that the same or does killfile go by
the sender's ip?

01-30-2005, 10:48 PM

Brian Wax wrote:
> Another bright one, F.Golightly. Are you Roger or whomever? You add nothing
> of value and try to hide your identity.
>
> I for one am tired of the spammers on these groups who have nothing
> intelligent to add and simply harass others. I do not know Marty Wallace and
> do not know why anyone would deserve this harassment. If I am totally off
> base--I still do not want to see this crap and I doubt that I am a minority
> in this matter.
>
> Yes. I encourage others to say something instead of being subject to this
> nonsense.
>
>

I am Marty Wallace.
I told Roger Bratton to stop harassing Alan Erskine on the aus.bicycle
newsgroup and now he harasses me. In my previous postings I've put his
home phone number and address. I can only suggest you contact his
service provider and register a complaint. I'm in Australia, otherwise
I'd visit Mr Bratton and deal with him personally. Do a search on
ZBOXMAN and you'll find he's been harassing people for quite some time.

Marty

01-30-2005, 10:48 PM

Brian Wax wrote:
> Another bright one, F.Golightly. Are you Roger or whomever? You add nothing
> of value and try to hide your identity.
>
> I for one am tired of the spammers on these groups who have nothing
> intelligent to add and simply harass others. I do not know Marty Wallace and
> do not know why anyone would deserve this harassment. If I am totally off
> base--I still do not want to see this crap and I doubt that I am a minority
> in this matter.
>
> Yes. I encourage others to say something instead of being subject to this
> nonsense.
>
>

I am Marty Wallace.
I told Roger Bratton to stop harassing Alan Erskine on the aus.bicycle
newsgroup and now he harasses me. In my previous postings I've put his
home phone number and address. I can only suggest you contact his
service provider and register a complaint. I'm in Australia, otherwise
I'd visit Mr Bratton and deal with him personally. Do a search on
ZBOXMAN and you'll find he's been harassing people for quite some time.

Marty

01-30-2005, 11:15 PM

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:16:07 -0800, wrote:

> i have OE which has "block sender". is that the same or does killfile go by
> the sender's ip?

LOL, I wish I could block by IP, that would be handy. Block sender is
pretty much like "adding to a killfile". It's the simple and quick way.

Some of the fancier newsreaders let you get specific by specifying which
subject to block--you can often use a wildcard to filter out stuff like
"*viagra*" where the "*" can be whatever. You can also killfile by
filtering by the references in the header.

My newsreader (Pan) and many others let you set a "time out" on a low
score (plonking or killing effectively just lowers the score to -9999 and
you choose just to not view low scores, that's how it works) so that if
you're having a spat with "Fred" you can ignore him for 30 days if you
want.

Most of these newsreaders keep the scorefile in a plain text file that can
be edited with a text editor.

A bit complex to be sure, but a little time invested can be well spent
depending on what groups you frequent. Usenet spam varies greatly from
group to group. I'd love to know why.

01-30-2005, 11:15 PM

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:16:07 -0800, wrote:

> i have OE which has "block sender". is that the same or does killfile go by
> the sender's ip?

LOL, I wish I could block by IP, that would be handy. Block sender is
pretty much like "adding to a killfile". It's the simple and quick way.

Some of the fancier newsreaders let you get specific by specifying which
subject to block--you can often use a wildcard to filter out stuff like
"*viagra*" where the "*" can be whatever. You can also killfile by
filtering by the references in the header.

My newsreader (Pan) and many others let you set a "time out" on a low
score (plonking or killing effectively just lowers the score to -9999 and
you choose just to not view low scores, that's how it works) so that if
you're having a spat with "Fred" you can ignore him for 30 days if you
want.

Most of these newsreaders keep the scorefile in a plain text file that can
be edited with a text editor.

A bit complex to be sure, but a little time invested can be well spent
depending on what groups you frequent. Usenet spam varies greatly from
group to group. I'd love to know why.

01-30-2005, 11:17 PM

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:16:07 -0800, wrote:

> does killfile go by
> the sender's ip?

to actually answer your question, I believe most newsreaders just go by
authorname, but I'm not an authority.

01-30-2005, 11:17 PM

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:16:07 -0800, wrote:

> does killfile go by
> the sender's ip?

to actually answer your question, I believe most newsreaders just go by
authorname, but I'm not an authority.

01-31-2005, 06:15 AM

Hi Marty!

If enough people file a complaint they (ISP) will take action. I recognize
that I take the risk of spamming from this guy. However, he lives very close
to me and I will follow up with the appropriate action.

We should not let people like this slander others and collectively we could
make the difference. Roger's diatribes are meant to be malicious and subject
to review by civil and criminal courts.

Brian

01-31-2005, 06:15 AM

Hi Marty!

If enough people file a complaint they (ISP) will take action. I recognize
that I take the risk of spamming from this guy. However, he lives very close
to me and I will follow up with the appropriate action.

We should not let people like this slander others and collectively we could
make the difference. Roger's diatribes are meant to be malicious and subject
to review by civil and criminal courts.

Brian

01-31-2005, 12:07 PM

Brian Wax wrote:
> Hi Marty!
>
> If enough people file a complaint they (ISP) will take action. I recognize
> that I take the risk of spamming from this guy. However, he lives very close
> to me and I will follow up with the appropriate action.
>
> We should not let people like this slander others and collectively we could
> make the difference. Roger's diatribes are meant to be malicious and subject
> to review by civil and criminal courts.
>
> Brian
>
Hey would you foilks kindly stop crossposting this stuf to the entire
usenet...... It really has no value to the RBR crowd. Killfiled.