titanium recommendation? - Page 2 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

03-11-2005, 10:53 AM

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:39:25 -0700, Craig Brossman
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>If you are looking at spending several grand for a frame, then this may
>not be for you. There are better finished Ti frames out there, but you
>do pay for it. At $800 a frame, I feel Habanero is a very good deal and
>was please with the service.

No..the cheaper the better! thanks for the recommendation and will
look into it.

I do feel bad about going to a LBS just to get a proper size bike if I
plan on finding the cheapest place to buy it. ( does that even make
any sense?)

03-11-2005, 11:50 AM

"Bob Terrwilliger" wrote:

> I do feel bad about going to a LBS just to get a proper size bike if I
> plan on finding the cheapest place to buy it. ( does that even make
> any sense?)

Not really. The main reason you're buying a new bike is to get a good fit.
Frame "size" alone doesn't determine fit. For one thing, a "60 cm" frame
from one manufacturer can be very different than a 60 cm from another. A
good LBS will listen to you, get you on an appropriate bike, and then set
you up with the proper saddle position, handlebar height, and stem
extension. And most importantly, they'll let you test ride a couple of bikes
for comparison. If that costs a few bucks more than a mail order bike, it's
well worth it.

Try out a few bikes of different materials and different price points and
see how much difference you notice. My guess is that an inexpensive bike
that fits great will be just as much fun to ride than as expensive one.

The key is finding that "good" LBS. It isn't always easy. If there are bike
clubs in your area, get some recommendations. Or just drop in to a few shops
and see what the atmosphere is like.

Art Harris

03-11-2005, 11:57 AM

I'll second Art's comments. The key to having a great bike is having a
great fitting bike. A poorly fit $5000 bike isn't all that great and
you'll get much more enjoyment out of a well fit $1000 model.
Sure if your fit is dialed in and you or your friends are experienced
with fit and mechanics a mail order bike can save you money and be fit
just fine. But that dopesn't sound like your situation.
My understanding is that the margins on bikes (as opposed to
accessories) is rather thin. So it is unlikely that savings are goin to
be huge.
I'm riding a 10 year old Litespeed and love it. Mainly because I had it
fit properly when I bought it. So, if it cost an extra $100, that's
about $10 a year for a great bike fit.

03-11-2005, 01:04 PM

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:10:15 -0500, jj wrote:

> Uh, I don't know about it 'beating you to death'. Mine gives a pretty
> smooth ride, using 26mm tires, though my model has a carbon fork.

I know what he's talking about. I went from a 1100 to my cheap Ti
bike. You can really feel the difference and before anyone goes nuts
with wheel and tire comob's. I use the old wheels and tires as they're
upgrades. I still use the bike from time to time so it's been upgraded
to an 8 speed. Next upgrade will be to 9. BTW, one thing I noticed
about the 1100 the bottom bracket is like spaghetti. I'm not a big guy
but I can twist it. The RX100 I have has better components and I can't
twist the BB and I've gotten stronger since I switched over to the Ti
bike.

--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Text only)
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (HCS II)
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] My HA Blog

03-11-2005, 03:00 PM

Bob Terrwilliger wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> I am in the market for a new bike. My current bike is almost 20 years
> old . I am interested in carbon or ti. and there seems to be a lot of
> info on carbon bikes. But I am having a difficult time finding
> recommendations of Ti bikes. Itc ould be because of my price range, I
> dont know. I want to spend 1500 to 2300 or so. the less the better. I
> dont need the best out there, I only ride for pleasure, about 100-200
> miles a week, and I do a century or two each year.

Ti bikes are usually expensive. You'll probably have a hard time
getting a frame alone that will fit in that price range, unless you go
with Habanero or Airborne or something. And then there are the
components...

My question is, why do you think you need Ti or carbon? Why not go
with a really nice, lightweight steel bike for thousands less? As
others have said, frame materials matter less than other factors.

You say you don't like your current Al bike, but much of that is
probably fitting issues, as others have commented. Psychologically, you
want a change in frame materials, of course. Plus, you secretly want
the "statusfaction" of having a high-quality bike. Fine. Let that push
you towards high-quality steel. Just start saying things to your self
like "steel is real", "steel is the classic material", etc. Soon you'll
become insufferable.

I testrode a DeRosa Neo Primato (steel) and it was as nice as any Ti
bike I rode, plus very light. And yes, I did end up buying a high-end
Ti/carbon bike, out of all the motivations sketched above (I, like you,
had a mid/low-range Al Trek - the 1220). It's OK - considering what I
spent. But I had to replace it, I might just go with the DeRosa .

Food for thought.

Dave

03-11-2005, 03:02 PM

Bob Terrwilliger wrote:

> Hello there.
>
> I am in the market for a new bike. My current bike is almost 20 years
> old . I am interested in carbon or ti. and there seems to be a lot of
> info on carbon bikes. But I am having a difficult time finding
> recommendations of Ti bikes. Itc ould be because of my price range, I
> dont know. I want to spend 1500 to 2300 or so. the less the better. I
> dont need the best out there, I only ride for pleasure, about 100-200
> miles a week, and I do a century or two each year.
>
> Anyone out there have good or bad things to say about a particular Ti
> bike they have or know about? any info would be helpful.

Check out this one:

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

For anyone looking to spend this kind of money on a new road bike, this is what
I'd point them to. I like Ti because of its elegant and indestructible finish.
The light weight is nice too. With this package you also get "real" wheels and
hill friendly gearing, a big plus IMO. Personally I'd toss the Brooks but some
people really love them.

Matt O.

03-11-2005, 03:46 PM

I too am 6'2 and weigh 205 lbs. My frame is a 60 cm. I can also ride a 58,
but a 56 is way too small.
So make sure you get the right size. You should test ride some
different-sized bikes to make sure.

"> Well. I guess I didnt give enough detail. My current bike is a trek
> 1000 aluminum. It is a 56cm. I am 6'2" and 205 lbs. I guess at the
> time I got it, I liked it. I dont know if I grew ( I do know my belly
> has) but the bike just doesnt seem to fit. It seems small. And it
> beats me to death. I want something that will fit. and something that
> will help smooth out the rodes just a tad. And something that will
> last me another 15-20 years.

03-11-2005, 03:52 PM

Hi,
I am of similar height and build. I wiegh about 195 at the same
height as you. I got back into biking this past year and had the same
issues. After deciding what price range I started riding different
bikes. I must tell you I was impressed by the steel frames out there
but I tried all but the TI. I ended up with a Specialized Roubaix 58cm
combo aluminum and carbon frame. The model I bought has the 105 package
and I am very happy with it. I have upgraded the saddle to a firmer
Body Geometry with the cutout. The stock seat had too much flex and I
was bouncing a bit too much. If price was no object I would opt for the
all carbon version of the Roubaix. I test road one and it was so stiff
but compliant over the bumps. I hope this helps and if you check your
local bike shop you should be able to find a leftover carbon in your
price range. I spent $1400 for the one I bought.

03-11-2005, 05:46 PM

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:56:05 GMT, Bob Terrwilliger <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>Hello there.
>
>I am in the market for a new bike. My current bike is almost 20 years
>old . I am interested in carbon or ti. and there seems to be a lot of
>info on carbon bikes. But I am having a difficult time finding
>recommendations of Ti bikes. Itc ould be because of my price range, I
>dont know. I want to spend 1500 to 2300 or so. the less the better. I
>dont need the best out there, I only ride for pleasure, about 100-200
>miles a week, and I do a century or two each year.
>
>Anyone out there have good or bad things to say about a particular Ti
>bike they have or know about? any info would be helpful.

If nobody's introduced you to Mark ....

You probably won't find a better buy in a titanium frame that his Habanero.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Build it with Mirage or something and you'll be in your target range nicely.

Ron

03-11-2005, 06:12 PM

"Bob Terrwilliger" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:53:43 -0500, "Arthur Harris" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Ti won't rust and an unpainted Ti bike won't scratch. Other than that,
what
> >will a Ti bike do that your current bike won't? Not much. For a lot less
> >money, you could upgrade the drivetrain on your current bike and have the
> >best of both worlds. I happen to like the geometry, clearance, and look
of
> >the '80s bikes much better than current models.
> >
> >Art Harris
> >
>
>
>
> Well. I guess I didnt give enough detail. My current bike is a trek
> 1000 aluminum. It is a 56cm. I am 6'2" and 205 lbs. I guess at the
> time I got it, I liked it. I dont know if I grew ( I do know my belly
> has) but the bike just doesnt seem to fit. It seems small. And it
> beats me to death. I want something that will fit. and something that
> will help smooth out the rodes just a tad. And something that will
> last me another 15-20 years.

It doesn't really seem like you have a material problem. You have a bike
design problem. You're riding a bike which is designed for a racer(even
though it's 20 years old). You probably have skinny high pressure tires on
it, and the bars are probably set way lower than the saddle. A nice
Cannondale touring bike would do you very nicely---provided you can get the
bars even with the saddle height. A touring bike would also give you the
ability to run a fatter tire, which you can use at lower pressure to improve
your comfort. Lightspeed makes a touring bike called the Blue Ridge, I
think, but it's gonna be expensive. You can get into a Trek 520 touring bike
for a grand, but it's steel, and you didn't mention steel as a material of
choice.