All Forums Forum List Register Members List Calendar Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Road Biking Forums > Road Bike Chat > Consumer Reports bicycle review


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2004, 08:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
David Kerber
 
Posts: n/a
Consumer Reports bicycle review

Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.

They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
good article.

--
Dave Kerber
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Arthur Harris
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review


"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.


I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:

"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

and

"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."

Art Harris


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Arthur Harris
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review


"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.


I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:

"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

and

"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."

Art Harris


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
Arthur Harris
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review


"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.


I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:

"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

and

"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."

Art Harris


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Arthur Harris
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review


"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.


I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:

"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

and

"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."

Art Harris


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Arthur Harris
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review


"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.


I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:

"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

and

"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."

Art Harris


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
maxo
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:33:09 +0000, Arthur Harris wrote:

> "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
> absorbs shock."


They should have given tires a shot. I like mine real good.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
maxo
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:33:09 +0000, Arthur Harris wrote:

> "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
> absorbs shock."


They should have given tires a shot. I like mine real good.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
maxo
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:33:09 +0000, Arthur Harris wrote:

> "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
> absorbs shock."


They should have given tires a shot. I like mine real good.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 12:47 PM   #10 (permalink)
maxo
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:33:09 +0000, Arthur Harris wrote:

> "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
> absorbs shock."


They should have given tires a shot. I like mine real good.



  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21