|
06-04-2004, 08:06 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | | Consumer Reports bicycle review Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
good article.
--
Dave Kerber
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible). | |
| |
06-04-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | | Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review
"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.
I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:
"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."
and
"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."
Art Harris | |
| |
06-04-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | | Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review
"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.
I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:
"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."
and
"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."
Art Harris | |
| |
06-04-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | | Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review
"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.
I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:
"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."
and
"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."
Art Harris | |
| |
06-04-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | | Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review
"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.
I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:
"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."
and
"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."
Art Harris | |
| |
06-04-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | | Re: Consumer Reports bicycle review
"David Kerber" wrote:
> Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
> and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.
>
> They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
> market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
> rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
> mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
> adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
> good article.
I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
me wince, like:
"Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."
and
"Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
absorbs shock."
Art Harris | |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com |