All Forums Forum List Register Members List Calendar Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Road Biking Forums > Road Bike Chat > Re: published helmet research - not troll


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2004, 07:34 PM   #91 (permalink)
Tom Kunich
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Jim Flom" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:hlrAc.94$K53.91@edtnps89...
> "John Forrest Tomlinson" wrote...
> >
> > Assuming that's true, what does that matter if the odds of being
> > killed are extremely small.?

>
> I have a hard time believing you don't wear a helmet, John Forrest.
>
> Jim "academically speaking" Flom


Yeah but after he read about Lance's health problem he's been sitting on it.


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:30 PM   #92 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...


> >
> > Randy's site is not "rabid," even if you don't agree with everything
> > he says (or anything he says, for that matter.)

>
> Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least Frank
> is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.


Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:30 PM   #93 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...


> >
> > Randy's site is not "rabid," even if you don't agree with everything
> > he says (or anything he says, for that matter.)

>
> Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least Frank
> is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.


Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:30 PM   #94 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...


> >
> > Randy's site is not "rabid," even if you don't agree with everything
> > he says (or anything he says, for that matter.)

>
> Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least Frank
> is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.


Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:30 PM   #95 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...


> >
> > Randy's site is not "rabid," even if you don't agree with everything
> > he says (or anything he says, for that matter.)

>
> Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least Frank
> is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.


Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:30 PM   #96 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...


> >
> > Randy's site is not "rabid," even if you don't agree with everything
> > he says (or anything he says, for that matter.)

>
> Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least Frank
> is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.


Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:46 PM   #97 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

From last string of messages from Kunich:

> Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..


Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive. If you
want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:

<http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.

Kunich has posted repeated lies about me, with post after post of
childish insults, all due to his helmet hangup. He is simply not
credible on this subject.

Next message:

> Just like a dozen years ago, you simply make things up as you go.
> That doesn't surprise me at all. You also seem eager to avoid believing
> strong evidence that is contrary to your agenda.


More lies from Kunich.

> That's because you never looked. The fact that there was a super dramatic
> drop in children's bicycle sales didn't seem to garner any attention from
> you either.


He means they saturated the market with one type of bike and a new
style wasn't out yet, so some random person Kunich talked to blamed
the helmets, assuming Kunich didn't maket he whole thing up. Basically
he talked to a shop owner who was mad that business had dropped off
for some reason. Like many people upset about a loss of income, the
guy probably needed something to blame, and picked the first convenient
target.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:46 PM   #98 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

From last string of messages from Kunich:

> Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..


Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive. If you
want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:

<http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.

Kunich has posted repeated lies about me, with post after post of
childish insults, all due to his helmet hangup. He is simply not
credible on this subject.

Next message:

> Just like a dozen years ago, you simply make things up as you go.
> That doesn't surprise me at all. You also seem eager to avoid believing
> strong evidence that is contrary to your agenda.


More lies from Kunich.

> That's because you never looked. The fact that there was a super dramatic
> drop in children's bicycle sales didn't seem to garner any attention from
> you either.


He means they saturated the market with one type of bike and a new
style wasn't out yet, so some random person Kunich talked to blamed
the helmets, assuming Kunich didn't maket he whole thing up. Basically
he talked to a shop owner who was mad that business had dropped off
for some reason. Like many people upset about a loss of income, the
guy probably needed something to blame, and picked the first convenient
target.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:46 PM   #99 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

From last string of messages from Kunich:

> Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..


Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive. If you
want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:

<http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.

Kunich has posted repeated lies about me, with post after post of
childish insults, all due to his helmet hangup. He is simply not
credible on this subject.

Next message:

> Just like a dozen years ago, you simply make things up as you go.
> That doesn't surprise me at all. You also seem eager to avoid believing
> strong evidence that is contrary to your agenda.


More lies from Kunich.

> That's because you never looked. The fact that there was a super dramatic
> drop in children's bicycle sales didn't seem to garner any attention from
> you either.


He means they saturated the market with one type of bike and a new
style wasn't out yet, so some random person Kunich talked to blamed
the helmets, assuming Kunich didn't maket he whole thing up. Basically
he talked to a shop owner who was mad that business had dropped off
for some reason. Like many people upset about a loss of income, the
guy probably needed something to blame, and picked the first convenient
target.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:46 PM   #100 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

From last string of messages from Kunich:

> Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..


Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive. If you
want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:

<http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.

Kunich has posted repeated lies about me, with post after post of
childish insults, all due to his helmet hangup. He is simply not
credible on this subject.

Next message:

> Just like a dozen years ago, you simply make things up as you go.
> That doesn't surprise me at all. You also seem eager to avoid believing
> strong evidence that is contrary to your agenda.


More lies from Kunich.

> That's because you never looked. The fact that there was a super dramatic
> drop in children's bicycle sales didn't seem to garner any attention from
> you either.


He means they saturated the market with one type of bike and a new
style wasn't out yet, so some random person Kunich talked to blamed
the helmets, assuming Kunich didn't maket he whole thing up. Basically
he talked to a shop owner who was mad that business had dropped off
for some reason. Like many people upset about a loss of income, the
guy probably needed something to blame, and picked the first convenient
target.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21