Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
>
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> >> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> >> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> >> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
> >> > messages from Kunich:
> >> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
> >> >
> >> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
> >> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
> >>
> >> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
> >> explain what is abusive about that.
> >
> > I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
> > behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against anyone
> > who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you.
> > As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.
>
> Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.
Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got fed
up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which they
did repeatedly.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
>>
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>> >
>> >> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> >> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> >> > messages from Kunich:
>> >> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >> >
>> >> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet,"
>> >> > he goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>> >>
>> >> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> >> explain what is abusive about that.
>> >
>> > I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
>> > behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against
>> > anyone who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it
>> > suits you. As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.
>>
>> Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.
>
> Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> they did repeatedly.
You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
well as insisting you are right on all topics.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
>>
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>> >
>> >> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> >> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> >> > messages from Kunich:
>> >> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >> >
>> >> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet,"
>> >> > he goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>> >>
>> >> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> >> explain what is abusive about that.
>> >
>> > I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
>> > behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against
>> > anyone who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it
>> > suits you. As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.
>>
>> Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.
>
> Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> they did repeatedly.
You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
well as insisting you are right on all topics.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
>>
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>> >
>> >> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> >> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> >> > messages from Kunich:
>> >> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >> >
>> >> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet,"
>> >> > he goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>> >>
>> >> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> >> explain what is abusive about that.
>> >
>> > I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
>> > behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against
>> > anyone who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it
>> > suits you. As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.
>>
>> Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.
>
> Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> they did repeatedly.
You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
well as insisting you are right on all topics.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
>>
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>> >
>> >> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> >> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> >> > messages from Kunich:
>> >> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >> >
>> >> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet,"
>> >> > he goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>> >>
>> >> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> >> explain what is abusive about that.
>> >
>> > I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
>> > behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against
>> > anyone who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it
>> > suits you. As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.
>>
>> Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.
>
> Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> they did repeatedly.
You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
well as insisting you are right on all topics.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
>>
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>> >
>> >> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> >> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> >> > messages from Kunich:
>> >> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >> >
>> >> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet,"
>> >> > he goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>> >>
>> >> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> >> explain what is abusive about that.
>> >
>> > I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
>> > behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against
>> > anyone who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it
>> > suits you. As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.
>>
>> Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.
>
> Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> they did repeatedly.
You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
well as insisting you are right on all topics.
Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> > Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> > over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> > fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> > they did repeatedly.
>
> You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
> well as insisting you are right on all topics.
Uh huh. Guess I'll write you off too.
BTW, the anti-helmet crew did lie repeatedly. Why don't you look at
the vitriolic reaction I got for suggesting that helmets provide some
useful protection but are not a panacea? Does that sound unreasonable
to you?
One guy in particular posted repeated lies about me about me posting
continually to newsgroups (on a different topic) and when I called him
on it repeatedly, he could not produce a single example of anything I
had posted there, and simply muttered instead about archives but never
being able to produce a URL. Their standard procedure is to
personally attack anyone who they disagree with: usenet posters,
researchers, anyone.
Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> > Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> > over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> > fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> > they did repeatedly.
>
> You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
> well as insisting you are right on all topics.
Uh huh. Guess I'll write you off too.
BTW, the anti-helmet crew did lie repeatedly. Why don't you look at
the vitriolic reaction I got for suggesting that helmets provide some
useful protection but are not a panacea? Does that sound unreasonable
to you?
One guy in particular posted repeated lies about me about me posting
continually to newsgroups (on a different topic) and when I called him
on it repeatedly, he could not produce a single example of anything I
had posted there, and simply muttered instead about archives but never
being able to produce a URL. Their standard procedure is to
personally attack anyone who they disagree with: usenet posters,
researchers, anyone.
Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> > Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> > over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> > fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> > they did repeatedly.
>
> You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
> well as insisting you are right on all topics.
Uh huh. Guess I'll write you off too.
BTW, the anti-helmet crew did lie repeatedly. Why don't you look at
the vitriolic reaction I got for suggesting that helmets provide some
useful protection but are not a panacea? Does that sound unreasonable
to you?
One guy in particular posted repeated lies about me about me posting
continually to newsgroups (on a different topic) and when I called him
on it repeatedly, he could not produce a single example of anything I
had posted there, and simply muttered instead about archives but never
being able to produce a URL. Their standard procedure is to
personally attack anyone who they disagree with: usenet posters,
researchers, anyone.
Tim McNamara <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:
> > Nope. I only told them off after repeated abuse that continued for
> > over a month (or was it several months.) Eventually, I simply got
> > fed up with these bozos. And they were the only ones lying, which
> > they did repeatedly.
>
> You seem very prone to accusing others that they are lying, Bill, as
> well as insisting you are right on all topics.
Uh huh. Guess I'll write you off too.
BTW, the anti-helmet crew did lie repeatedly. Why don't you look at
the vitriolic reaction I got for suggesting that helmets provide some
useful protection but are not a panacea? Does that sound unreasonable
to you?
One guy in particular posted repeated lies about me about me posting
continually to newsgroups (on a different topic) and when I called him
on it repeatedly, he could not produce a single example of anything I
had posted there, and simply muttered instead about archives but never
being able to produce a URL. Their standard procedure is to
personally attack anyone who they disagree with: usenet posters,
researchers, anyone.