All Forums Forum List Register Members List Calendar Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Road Biking Forums > Road Bike Chat > Re: published helmet research - not troll


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2004, 09:35 PM   #161 (permalink)
Tom Kunich
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>
> What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
> people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
> your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
> for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)


Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?

You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
they just shake their heads.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 10:14 PM   #162 (permalink)
Chris B.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:35:45 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>>
>> What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
>> people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
>> your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
>> for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
>Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
>seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
>you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
>managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
>pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?
>
>You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
>Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
>they just shake their heads.


Their helmeted or non-helmeted heads?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 10:14 PM   #163 (permalink)
Chris B.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:35:45 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>>
>> What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
>> people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
>> your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
>> for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
>Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
>seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
>you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
>managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
>pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?
>
>You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
>Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
>they just shake their heads.


Their helmeted or non-helmeted heads?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 10:14 PM   #164 (permalink)
Chris B.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:35:45 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>>
>> What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
>> people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
>> your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
>> for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
>Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
>seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
>you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
>managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
>pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?
>
>You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
>Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
>they just shake their heads.


Their helmeted or non-helmeted heads?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 10:14 PM   #165 (permalink)
Chris B.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:35:45 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>>
>> What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
>> people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
>> your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
>> for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
>Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
>seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
>you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
>managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
>pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?
>
>You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
>Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
>they just shake their heads.


Their helmeted or non-helmeted heads?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 10:14 PM   #166 (permalink)
Chris B.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:35:45 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>>
>> What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
>> people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
>> your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
>> for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
>Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
>seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
>you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
>managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
>pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?
>
>You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
>Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
>they just shake their heads.


Their helmeted or non-helmeted heads?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:32 PM   #167 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> >
> > What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
> > people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
> > your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
> > for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
> Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
> seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
> you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
> managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
> pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?


Go ahead, you bald-faced lying piece of human trash, and see if you
can produce a URL to back up your lies. You couldn't possibly find
any for a very simple reason - I've posted zero or nearly zero on any
of those groups. So yes, I'll call you on it. Produce the URLs or be
branded a liar - we've been through this before and you've yet to
produce a single URL.

BTW, if I thought anyone would take your lies seriously (after all,
anyone can easily check) I'd have more than enough grounds to sue your
ass for libel - you've posted this lie (with minor variations)
repeatedly and repeatedly refused to back it up with a URL (and the
Unix messages are all archived.) It is not an honest mistake on your
part.

> You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
> Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
> they just shake their heads.


Another of Kunich's lies - I've never *once* been in a bike shop in
Cupertino. It's 10 miles from where I live, we have good bike
shops here, and I use a bike for transportation, not racing, so there
is no reason for me to go to a shop in Cupertino to "hang out."

Well guys, what can you expect from a guy like Tom Kunich who,
according to his own accout, once "back handed" his girlfriend and
ended up in jail. See

<http://www.google.com/groups?q=+%22back+handed%22+author:kunich&hl=en&lr =&ie=UTF-8&scoring=r&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40news read2.prod.itd.earthlink.net&rnum=1>,

which quotes Kunich as saying, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
You'll find that in the last paragraph of the post, and Kunich wrote
it. The quote is word-for-word taken off of a google archive. Just
search newsgroups for "back handed" in messages written by Kunich.

He was abusive then, and he's abusive now. Character assasination and
bald-faced lies are part of the standard operating procedure used by
these fanatics. You'll see more if the thread continues.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:32 PM   #168 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> >
> > What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
> > people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
> > your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
> > for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
> Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
> seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
> you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
> managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
> pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?


Go ahead, you bald-faced lying piece of human trash, and see if you
can produce a URL to back up your lies. You couldn't possibly find
any for a very simple reason - I've posted zero or nearly zero on any
of those groups. So yes, I'll call you on it. Produce the URLs or be
branded a liar - we've been through this before and you've yet to
produce a single URL.

BTW, if I thought anyone would take your lies seriously (after all,
anyone can easily check) I'd have more than enough grounds to sue your
ass for libel - you've posted this lie (with minor variations)
repeatedly and repeatedly refused to back it up with a URL (and the
Unix messages are all archived.) It is not an honest mistake on your
part.

> You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
> Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
> they just shake their heads.


Another of Kunich's lies - I've never *once* been in a bike shop in
Cupertino. It's 10 miles from where I live, we have good bike
shops here, and I use a bike for transportation, not racing, so there
is no reason for me to go to a shop in Cupertino to "hang out."

Well guys, what can you expect from a guy like Tom Kunich who,
according to his own accout, once "back handed" his girlfriend and
ended up in jail. See

<http://www.google.com/groups?q=+%22back+handed%22+author:kunich&hl=en&lr =&ie=UTF-8&scoring=r&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40news read2.prod.itd.earthlink.net&rnum=1>,

which quotes Kunich as saying, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
You'll find that in the last paragraph of the post, and Kunich wrote
it. The quote is word-for-word taken off of a google archive. Just
search newsgroups for "back handed" in messages written by Kunich.

He was abusive then, and he's abusive now. Character assasination and
bald-faced lies are part of the standard operating procedure used by
these fanatics. You'll see more if the thread continues.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:32 PM   #169 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> >
> > What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
> > people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
> > your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
> > for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
> Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
> seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
> you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
> managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
> pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?


Go ahead, you bald-faced lying piece of human trash, and see if you
can produce a URL to back up your lies. You couldn't possibly find
any for a very simple reason - I've posted zero or nearly zero on any
of those groups. So yes, I'll call you on it. Produce the URLs or be
branded a liar - we've been through this before and you've yet to
produce a single URL.

BTW, if I thought anyone would take your lies seriously (after all,
anyone can easily check) I'd have more than enough grounds to sue your
ass for libel - you've posted this lie (with minor variations)
repeatedly and repeatedly refused to back it up with a URL (and the
Unix messages are all archived.) It is not an honest mistake on your
part.

> You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
> Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
> they just shake their heads.


Another of Kunich's lies - I've never *once* been in a bike shop in
Cupertino. It's 10 miles from where I live, we have good bike
shops here, and I use a bike for transportation, not racing, so there
is no reason for me to go to a shop in Cupertino to "hang out."

Well guys, what can you expect from a guy like Tom Kunich who,
according to his own accout, once "back handed" his girlfriend and
ended up in jail. See

<http://www.google.com/groups?q=+%22back+handed%22+author:kunich&hl=en&lr =&ie=UTF-8&scoring=r&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40news read2.prod.itd.earthlink.net&rnum=1>,

which quotes Kunich as saying, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
You'll find that in the last paragraph of the post, and Kunich wrote
it. The quote is word-for-word taken off of a google archive. Just
search newsgroups for "back handed" in messages written by Kunich.

He was abusive then, and he's abusive now. Character assasination and
bald-faced lies are part of the standard operating procedure used by
these fanatics. You'll see more if the thread continues.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:32 PM   #170 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: published helmet research - not troll

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> >
> > What I'm saying is that you personally are one of the most abusive
> > people on usenet, particularly wen it comes to anyone disagreeing with
> > your pet peeves. Anyone can go back to the archives and look (or
> > for that matter, they can look at the URL I recently posted.)

>
> Well, actually I sort of consider that to be a real compliment since I've
> seen what people have called you on the Sun groups and the Unix groups when
> you tried to pass off your phoney information on people more informed. If I
> managed to be more abusive than they were I have to think that I must be
> pretty imaginative. Should we quote some of THOSE?


Go ahead, you bald-faced lying piece of human trash, and see if you
can produce a URL to back up your lies. You couldn't possibly find
any for a very simple reason - I've posted zero or nearly zero on any
of those groups. So yes, I'll call you on it. Produce the URLs or be
branded a liar - we've been through this before and you've yet to
produce a single URL.

BTW, if I thought anyone would take your lies seriously (after all,
anyone can easily check) I'd have more than enough grounds to sue your
ass for libel - you've posted this lie (with minor variations)
repeatedly and repeatedly refused to back it up with a URL (and the
Unix messages are all archived.) It is not an honest mistake on your
part.

> You forget, Bill, I met you in person at that bike shop that used to be in
> Cupertino many years ago. Back when people just laughed when you left. Now
> they just shake their heads.


Another of Kunich's lies - I've never *once* been in a bike shop in
Cupertino. It's 10 miles from where I live, we have good bike
shops here, and I use a bike for transportation, not racing, so there
is no reason for me to go to a shop in Cupertino to "hang out."

Well guys, what can you expect from a guy like Tom Kunich who,
according to his own accout, once "back handed" his girlfriend and
ended up in jail. See

<http://www.google.com/groups?q=+%22back+handed%22+author:kunich&hl=en&lr =&ie=UTF-8&scoring=r&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40news read2.prod.itd.earthlink.net&rnum=1>,

which quotes Kunich as saying, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
You'll find that in the last paragraph of the post, and Kunich wrote
it. The quote is word-for-word taken off of a google archive. Just
search newsgroups for "back handed" in messages written by Kunich.

He was abusive then, and he's abusive now. Character assasination and
bald-faced lies are part of the standard operating procedure used by
these fanatics. You'll see more if the thread continues.

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21