"Badger_South" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:20:07 -0400, "psycholist" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Ian (remove the antispam)" <ianstock"antispam"@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> >message news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> >> What's better for regular lubing of chain, hubs, derailleur, etc on a
> >hybrid
> >> used mostly for road touring?
> >>
> >> A very light spray oil (like WD-40), something heavier (3 in 1 light
> >machine
> >> oil), or a heavier grease?
> >>
> >> I'd like to be able to avoid buying the small overpriced bottle of
"chain
> >> lube" at the bike shop.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Ian
> >>
> >
> >Of the choices you offered, I'd guess the 3 in 1 would be best. If you
> >really want to go cheap, I've heard that used motor oil from a car makes
an
> >excellent chain lube. WD 40 won't do and heavy grease will collect way
too
> >much dirt and probably won't work into the pins very well.
> >
> >Bob C.
> >
>
> My understanding is that the real 'lube' for chain lube is suppoed to be a
> type of wax, and not a type of oil.
>
> I was told by a LBS owner:
> 1. WD-40 is not good, and that the lube in this was 'lanolin'. It
> collects dirt. (For MTB use the lube is almost entirely 'wax' and little
> else, and it is the most resistant to dirt-collection.
> 2. The chain, to be properly lubed should be taken off the bike and
> thoroughly soaked in the 'lube' and then left to dry overnight. The
> transporting agent would evap., leaving the waxy substance on the chain
> 3. When you're lubing a chain you are not doing it for the outside, i.e.
> the chain in the sprockets. You're actually lubing the inner spindle and
> posts inside the chain that lets the individual chain segments move freely
> as they go around the circuit.
>
> Dunno if this is correct. FWIW. (this is the same guy who wants to charge
> my brother 30 bucks to true a wheel...!!)
>
> -Badger
>
I've heard of people who do that sort of thing. Sounds pretty anal to me.
I wonder if there's any research that suggest how many more miles (if any)
you get if you go through all that nonsense. On my road bike, I clean my
chain thoroughly (on the bike with a chain cleaning device and degreaser,
followed by soap and water) about every 300 miles. Then I re-lube with
Pedros extra dry (I rarely have to ride in damp conditions). Between
cleanings, I'll spray with an LPD-9 spray lube and wipe down really well
about every third ride. This seems to work fine.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:40:18 -0400, "psycholist" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>I've heard of people who do that sort of thing. Sounds pretty anal to me.
>I wonder if there's any research that suggest how many more miles (if any)
>you get if you go through all that nonsense.
Since most people would be discouraged from ever doing it in the first
place, not many more. Even if you did do it, I wonder if the
replacement would come at about the same time from other factors other
than simple lubrication issues.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:40:18 -0400, "psycholist" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>I've heard of people who do that sort of thing. Sounds pretty anal to me.
>I wonder if there's any research that suggest how many more miles (if any)
>you get if you go through all that nonsense.
Since most people would be discouraged from ever doing it in the first
place, not many more. Even if you did do it, I wonder if the
replacement would come at about the same time from other factors other
than simple lubrication issues.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:40:18 -0400, "psycholist" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>I've heard of people who do that sort of thing. Sounds pretty anal to me.
>I wonder if there's any research that suggest how many more miles (if any)
>you get if you go through all that nonsense.
Since most people would be discouraged from ever doing it in the first
place, not many more. Even if you did do it, I wonder if the
replacement would come at about the same time from other factors other
than simple lubrication issues.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:40:18 -0400, "psycholist" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>I've heard of people who do that sort of thing. Sounds pretty anal to me.
>I wonder if there's any research that suggest how many more miles (if any)
>you get if you go through all that nonsense.
Since most people would be discouraged from ever doing it in the first
place, not many more. Even if you did do it, I wonder if the
replacement would come at about the same time from other factors other
than simple lubrication issues.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...